Jonsmum

From Philsworld

Jonsmum is a loudmouth contributor to the blog belonging to Fore Sam.

She got involved very quickly in the argument, and after I revealed my website was the person who used my full name (christian and surname) on the blog without my permission - which is a breach of privacy. And attracted Dave Ayling, Lunatic Thighs and The Cunning Lingus to the blog just to back it up.

Like Fore Sam, I'm not going to be hypocritical and call her by her name, but nevertheless her behaviour was not acceptable. She accused me of not being a parent and therefore had no right to criticise - which I repudiate because I have "gone to school" on my own parents experience with me AND I have done my homework on other parents. Something that she has no right to blast. And she went further complaining that I shouldn't be calling Autism a "personality defect" along with my statement about the genetics and hereditary nature of all ASD's.

“So YOU, as a childless autistic adult/child, are saying that us parents who are NOT autistic, ARE autistic and insulting all autistics including yourself, myself, (name removed) and our children, by saying that autism is a "personality defect". Be ashamed. Be very ashamed.”

~ Jonsmum on Foresam's blog on November 29, 2006

I told her in reply I wasn't ashamed to tell the truth. And I added the following nasty, but thoroughly appropriate swipe at her.

“..the instant a parent starts making excuses, they are a failure in parenting. My parents succeeded, because they didn't panic like you obviously have. And they didn't have anywhere near the amount of support then that there is available now!”

~ Timelord on Foresam's blog on November 29, 2006

The brief I have on my website was then quoted and she tried to promote it as though it was a bad thing.

“Yes Phil, I do consider your "obstinate, callous, vindictive or insensitive" tendencies to be a bad thing.”

~ Jonsmum on Foresam's blog on December 3, 2006

And I told her that when I'm provoked that's how I am. Fact. And all she could say on that thread in response to that was;

“Seriously Phil.You're not coming over too well.”

~ Jonsmum on Foresam's blog on December 4, 2006

The fact remains that this woman is just as much a threat to her son as Fore Sam is to his. She's not a meglomaniac - I'll give there that much. But she follows one, and it's about time she got away from him. And also accept that Autism (and other ASD's) are genetic in origin and not caused by mercury poisoning.

“You're a pseudo aspie with more than a "touch" of schizoid personality disorder, and god knows what else.”

~ Jonsmum on Foresam's blog on December 23, 2006

As anyone who knows me knows, I am an Aspie. Pure and simple. And just to prove she's a drone;

“Well I got it from you, Phil.”

~ Jonsmum on Foresam's blog on December 23, 2006

(referring to my use of LMAO which she didn't know what it was!)

And she has the gall to claim she has an IQ of 155? What a load of cow manure! She obviously can't think for herself and needs others to guide her.

“If you continue to post here, don't complain about anyone getting on your back.”

~ Jonsmum on Foresam's blog on December 23, 2006

This reflected on my comment at Fore Sam to get off my back. When I said that I was referring to him ordering me around re getting treatment for mercury poisoning. Everything else has been fine (except for the two local troublemakers of course) and it's the right thing to fight back against bullies. AS much as they dish it out, they can't take it when it's dished back.

In late December Jonsmum and I had a confrontation on Michelle Dawson's blog. Michelle removed it (at my request as well as her own feelings on the matter) and Jonsmum threw the thing onto Fore Sam's blog instead. I reflected on it on my blog thus;

This morning I spent a quick moment online at my parent's place (on Christmas Day) and spied an attack on me on Michelle's blog. I quickly posted a reply.

Just now I went back there and both messages were removed. I did ask for mine to be removed if she removed the first one so that was OK. But the idiot who posted recorded her post and my reply and posted again. It was removed by Michelle, but the idiot replaced the lot on the HA blog.

I won't reprint the whole thing here, but Mrs Idiot claimed that I was a liar and that I'd said that Autism was "genetic damage" when I said NO SUCH THING. I fired back with both barrels telling her that damage does not equal suffering (certainly not in this case) as well as denying making the comment. I also referred to her as a "child abusing mother" (and I stand by that as well). Of course that caused the reply which Michelle deleted, and I'll pick up some bits this time;

“It's you're attitude towards people like me, not "the treatment" you've received from people like me that is the root cause of your problem.”